![angry joe best games of 2017 list angry joe best games of 2017 list](https://i.imgur.com/X9ZKmlW.jpg)
be baked into games now that allow for easy refunds for in game cosmetics. Charterstone this game gets mixed reviews (as do a lot of games), but the art combined with the game play is what really gets it over the line. Top 5 Legit Essay Writing Services Based on the Recommendations of Reddit.
![angry joe best games of 2017 list angry joe best games of 2017 list](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1Qi4qX04FhI/maxresdefault.jpg)
Personally, I can't afford/bring myself to pay even $10 for a virtual item in any game, but this point alone doesn't make me dislike it, because if the game is F2P, its obvious that some amount of revenue has to be generated in order to support the servers, pay the people that worked on the game, pay the people that make promotional material for the game, etc, but how do you accomplish that without being P2W? Well, you offer players skins for their guns, you make them shiny and you insert some artificial scarcity that will "force" players to seriously consider to buy them, if the reason that the game is F2P is because some people are willing to pay >$50 for a virtual item that has no real world value, then I have nothing left to say, except to repeat what I already said, I enjoyed the game, but I will never spend money on a virtual item, unless there is a profit to be made. Add in the extraordinary art and the fact that the game is a consistent challenge makes this a worthy entry into our best of 2017 list. Valorant on it's own is not a bad game, it comes form someone who is playing the game since beta to this day. It seems odd to put the game on "Top 10 Worst Games" list purely because of monetization, as if CS:GO and other games don't have the prices for skins or other virtual items that are even higher than $292. Such games are identified through overall low review scores including low aggregate scores on sites such as Metacritic, frequent appearances on worst games.